By Neil Resto℠
Aerospace Valley California
No, administrative housing data should not replace available survey data. Both types of data have their own strengths and weaknesses, and they can complement each other to provide a more complete understanding of housing issues.
Administrative housing data typically come from government agencies or other organizations that collect information on housing-related topics, such as building permits, property tax assessments, and housing assistance programs. These data are often comprehensive and reliable, as they are collected systematically and updated regularly. However, administrative data may not capture all aspects of housing, such as the quality of housing or the experiences of tenants.
Survey data, on the other hand, typically come from surveys of households or individuals, and can provide more nuanced and detailed information about people's experiences and perspectives. Surveys can capture a wide range of housing-related topics, such as affordability, housing quality, and access to services. However, surveys may be limited by the quality of the sample, as well as the accuracy and completeness of respondents' answers.
Therefore, it is important to use both types of data to get a more complete picture of housing issues. Administrative data can provide a broad overview of housing trends and patterns, while survey data can provide more detailed information on specific issues and experiences. Combining both types of data can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the housing landscape and help policymakers and researchers make more informed decisions.